Advisory Credential Playbook

A Practical Framework for CPA Firms Navigating the Advisory Shift
Introduction: Why This Playbook Exists
Advisory services are no longer optional for CPA firms—they are expected.
Clients increasingly look to their CPA not just for compliance, but for insight, judgment, and guidance. At the same time, technology and AI have made information abundant, elevating the importance of credibility, authority, and trust.
This Advisory Credential Playbook exists to address a growing reality inside many CPA firms:
Advisory responsibility is expanding faster than advisory credentialization.
The purpose of this page is not to promote individual credentials, but to provide a practical framework for how CPA firms can think about advisory roles, capability, and professional signaling in a rapidly evolving environment.
While this Playbook is written specifically for CPA firms, the framework reflects IBA’s broader approach to advisory credentialization across professional services.

The Advisory Shift Inside CPA Firms
Over the past decade, CPA firms have steadily expanded beyond traditional compliance services into:
- Client Accounting Services (CAS)
- Advisory and consulting
- Business performance and strategic discussions
- Growth, value creation, and exit readiness
In many firms, this shift occurred organically—driven by client demand rather than deliberate design.
As a result:
- Advisory work is being delivered
- Advisory expectations are rising
- Formal recognition of advisory capability is often inconsistent
Credentialization helps firms bring intentional structure to this evolution.

Why Credentials Matter More Than Ever
Credentials are not about replacing experience.
They are about:
- Making advisory capability visible
- Accelerating trust with clients and stakeholders
- Creating consistency across teams
- Supporting advisory pricing and positioning
In an environment where information is readily available, credentials function as signals of accountability and authority, not just education.
The Three Levels of CPA Advisory Credentialization
The advisory credentials offered by the Institute of Business Advisors are intentionally structured to reflect how advisory responsibility develops inside CPA firms.
Who it’s for:
Senior bookkeepers, CAS professionals, CAS managers and directors, controllers, and outsourced accounting leaders.
Purpose:
The Certified Accounting & Advisory Specialist (CAAS™) credential formalizes the transition from transactional accounting to advisory-ready accounting leadership. As Client Accounting Services (CAS) continues to be one of the fastest-growing service lines in CPA firms, CAAS™ provides professional recognition for those who advise clients using financial data—not just produce it.
Who it’s for:
Seniors, managers, directors, partners, and advisory-minded CPAs at any level.
Purpose:
The Certified Business Advisor Professional (CBAV™) credential is the foundational business advisory credential for CPAs who want to advise clients beyond compliance. CBAV™ establishes a shared advisory framework and signals readiness to participate confidently in advisory conversations, regardless of title.
Who it’s for:
Partners and growth-focused advisors involved in expansion, value creation, M&A readiness, or exit planning.
Purpose:
The Certified Business Growth Advisor (CBGA™) credential recognizes advisors who help clients grow, scale, and create enterprise value. CBGA™ represents the advanced stage of advisory maturity and is often pursued after establishing a strong advisory foundation.

Individual Credentials vs. Firm Strategy
Credentialization can occur at two complementary levels.
Individual level:
- Professional development
- Career progression
- Advisory identity
Firm level:
- Brand consistency
- Service scalability
- Succession planning
- Long-term positioning
Leading CPA firms align both—credentializing individuals while reinforcing firm-wide advisory standards.
Common Credentialization Models in CPA Firms
CPA firms adopt credential strategies in different ways, including:
- CAS-led models, where CAAS™ supports advisory-ready accounting teams
- Firm-wide advisory models, where CBAV™ establishes a common advisory foundation
- Growth advisory models, where CBGA™ supports expansion and value-creation services
Many firms adopt more than one model over time as advisory services mature.
The Risk of Not Credentializing
Firms that rely solely on informal experience without formal credentialization often encounter:
- Pricing pressure on advisory services
- Longer advisory sales cycles
- Inconsistent service delivery
- Increased succession risk
Credentialization makes advisory capability intentional, visible, and repeatable.

